The Dreaded Vaccination Post

Okay.  This is the first post I have added in many years.  I didn't think I would be posting any time soon, but we as a society are inundated with news revolving around the measles outbreaks that are occurring in the world today, and as a result many states are pushing more and more legislations to mandate vaccinations.

Heads up...if you haven't figured it out by now, this post will be controversial...  

I am going to try to present my reasoning for why I have chosen my path regarding vaccines.  I will quickly state that I am attempting to do so without contempt for the choices that anyone else has made, and I believe the decision of anyone, whether it is the same as mine or not, can be completely justified.  My purpose in writing this is to illustrate the thought process that went into my decision not to give my family a measles vaccination, regardless of the outbreaks that are currently occurring.  My sources in presenting this argument will mostly come from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the WHO (World Health Organization).  I hope that staying within this realm will limit the argument of whether my sources are legitimate, as they are widely considered reputable among the pro-mandatory vaccine community.

When you think of measles, what comes to mind?  Google the word measles and read the news articles being published.  All the news articles use words like "hotbeds for disease." and "putting other people in danger unnecessarily" (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/nyregion/measles-outbreak-ny-schools.html)

These articles and phrases are the media's way of grasping viewer's attention.  Throughout media history, fear-based reporting has always been the best way to secure viewership and make sure they thrive as a company.  While there is truth in what they are saying, it's really only half the story.  Here's the other half:

According to the CDC, in the decade prior to 1963 (when the measles vaccine was created), there were about 4 million cases of measles in the US each year.  Of those 4 million cases, 48,000 people were hospitalized, 1000 of those cases developed encephalitis (swelling in the brain.  In most cases, encephalitis is minor, and resolves itself in a few days, however, it can be serious enough to cause lasting brain damage and death) and 400 of the 4 million resulted in death. (https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html).  All of those statistics look terrifying, but they don't have to.  Simple statistics tells us that in the decade prior to 1963 only .01 percent of the population that contracted measles died.  Encephalitis rate was .025 percent, and hospitalization rate was at 1.2 percent.  Meaning, if you contracted measles, all other factors aside, you had a 99.99% chance of surviving, a 99.97 percent chance of not developing encephalitis (which, in most cases was minor and resolved itself in a few days) and a 98.8 percent chance of not even needing to visit the hospital.  Please do not consider these statistics to be insensitive.  None of these statistics take away from the tragedy that 400 people died.  They do, however, lay a groundwork for why I am not afraid of the measles.

Let's leap to 2019.  Up to April 26th, there has been a reported 704 measles cases reported in the U.S., more cases than there have been since 1994.  If the statistics we took from pre-vaccination era measles held true, that would mean that there should be 8 hospitalizations, and no cases of encephalitis or death.  Fortunately there have been no cases of encephalitis or death yet, however, there have been 66 hospitalizations from these outbreaks (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6817e1.htm).  66! That rate is almost nine times higher compared to traditional pre-vaccine statistics in the 1960's.  So what is causing this explosion of hospitalization rates?

According to the CDC and WHO, the people that are most at risk for a severe case of measles are children under 5 years old, adults over 20 years old, and pregnant women.  Also, anyone with an already compromised or weakened immune system can be at risk (https://www.cdc.gov/measles/hcp/index.html).  Once you contract the measles, if you are one of the lucky 99.99% that survives, you will be immune to it for life.  In addition, women who have this immunity from contracting the disease can offer "passive immunity" through their breastmilk if they choose to breastfeed their baby (https://www.healthline.com/health/measles).  There are also studies that show that breastmilk, while not offering total immunity, can strengthen a child's immune system for life, and prolonged breastfeeding beyond six months has a greater impact (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892025).

Here's the catch.  Thanks to vaccines, adults and mothers in our generation never had measles, never developed an immunity to it, and therefore could never offer passive immunity to their newborn children.  The result:  Greater susceptibility to developing measles under age 5 when it will be the most severe, and greater susceptibility to developing measles as an adult over 20 or pregnant due to not contracting it earlier in life.

Thus,

...When an outbreak like the one we are experiencing now occurs, the people who are most at risk for severe cases of measles are much more vulnerable... 

and our hospitalization rate is nine times higher than it should be.

It is clear, very clear, that vaccines are the most effective answer for preventing measles.  There's NO question about that.

My question for you to consider is this:  Are vaccines the most sustainable answer?  

With hospitalization rates skyrocketing the way they are, and the age groups referenced being vulnerable due to circumstances created by vaccines, ask yourself this question; if a collapse in the private sector stopped the manufacture of the measles vaccine, or a terrorist attack, or a natural disaster stopped the population from having access to vaccines, what do you think would happen?  According to the statistics we've seen this year, if 4 million people were to contract measles instead of 704, statistically speaking, one could argue that up to 360,000 people would be hospitalized instead of 48,000.

The alternative:
So what do we do?  We are kinda stuck aren't we?  Anyone who chooses not to vaccinate is exposing themselves and the community to potentially contracting measles, regardless of their philosophical viewpoint that perhaps this isn't a sustainable way to combat the disease.  While I can't offer a major earth shattering, revelatory change you can make, I can offer something simple that can help.  There have been several studies conducted that show if you are high in levels of vitamin A or receive a proper vitamin A dosage after contracting measles, your morbitity and mortality rates can be reduced by up to 84% (depending on age) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11869601) (https://www.cdc.gov/measles/hcp/index.html).  This means that with the proper administration of vitamin A, that group of 400 people out of 4 million that died in 1963 would be reduced to as low as 4 people.  Two other ways of looking at it:  With this proper management of measles, if you are one of the 4 million people who contracted measles, and you get the proper vitamin A treatment, you may have a .0001 percent chance of dying, or a 99.9999% chance of surviving.

In Conclusion:
I understand that these numbers are oversimplified.  There are deeper dives that need to be taken with all of this.  My issue is that instead of looking at measles from the standpoint of seeing how we can combat this without the use of vaccines, everyone is only pushing more vaccines.  The vaccine industry is a 6 billion dollar industry.  Until someone can figure out how to make 6 billion dollars by giving people vitamin A and a good diet, change is going to be hard to come by.  Ghandi told us that we need "to be the change you want to see in the world."  That is why my family and I have chosen, despite ridicule from family, friends, and the public, to seek after more sustainable ways of fighting against diseases  like the measles.  I do not claim to be a professional on this subject.  I am just a dad that wants what's best for his kids.

I do not believe I have the authority to tell someone what decision they should make, but I also believe that NO ONE else does either.  

Every individual should choose for themselves what they want to do.  Every individual should have the right to objectively study these things out for themselves and make a choice without worrying about persecution that may occur based on the choice they made.  Our country is founded on these principles of freedom.  I have researched it for myself and have made a choice.  As I said in the beginning, I can see the justification behind the choices others have made that are not the same as mine.

Regardless of what your choice is, there is no room for unkindness or contempt for the choices anyone makes. 

 If nothing else, I hope this post has illustrated my thought process behind why I choose not to vaccinate for measles, and perhaps can at least illuminate that maybe people who have chosen not to vaccinate are doing so because they are trying to make an educated decision.



DISCLAIMER:  I am happy to receive any comments or opinions that are centered in kindness regardless of whether they are aligned with my own.  As a rule, any unkind or contemptuous comment will be deleted and the person making it will be blocked.